sony a8f vs a8g

Sony A8G and A8F use Sony’s proprietary technology called “Acoustic Surface” as their sound technology. Jun 22, 2020 #1 Hi all, I am looking to purchase a 55 inch OLED and narrowed down my choice to Sony A8H (2020) and Sony A9G (2019). Meanwhile, the HDR formats they support are also same, which are HDR10, HLG, and Dolby Vision. However, this doesn’t mean the OLED panel doesn’t have flaws. But a bit unfortunate, they only have decent color volume. Absolutely nothing, in fact I believe it sold just to make the A8F owners feel better. The resolution that supported by them are also same. And if we look at the bottom part, they have different design of stand. Unfortunately, despite the A8F’s excellent picture quality and stunning design, it’s not justifiably better than LG’s offerings, and in many ways, it’s worse. Since they both have perfect black level, they both might be able to produce dark colors fairly well. T. Tvbug82 Novice Member. If OLED TVs including Sony A8G and A8F have superior black in comparison with LED TV, this does not apply to their peak brightness, particularly in comparison with premium LED TVs. With 60 fps content, they both support 1080p, 1440p, 4K, 4K @ 4:4:4, while with 120 fps, they both only support 1080p and 1440p resolution. But in comparison with premium LED TVs, their performance is still far. The form factor is reason enough for me to get the A8G over the A8F. Sony A8H (2020) vs Sony A9G (2019) - help! For OLED TVs, what reached by them is actually really good. Sony A8G vs A8F Performance Contrast and Black Level. Can be ascertained, the characteristic and technical platform of their panel is not far different to LG OLED TV like OLED C9, E9 and others. There are other reasons I’d probably save my money and go with LG’s TV over the A8F, as well. But on the other hand, this will de-saturated pure colors at high brightness level. But expected, both of them will receive an update to Android 8.0 Oreo soon. In comparison with LED TVs, this is equivalent to an LED TV that has local dimming with the number of dimming zones is the same to the number of pixel. But a bit unfortunate, their peak brightness is not so bright. If we assume they are LED TV with Full Array Local Dimming, with 4K resolution, they both have around 8 millions of dimming zones. A8G has weaker audio (specs say 40W vs 50W total) than A8F. For maximizing their performance in processing motion, Sony A8F and A8G both are powered by the Motion Flow XR technology. Sony claims that its processing technology is what separates its TVs from other OLEDs and that the A8F’s proprietary X1 Extreme 4K HDR processor is the key to even better image quality. Additionally, they both don’t also support HDMI 2.1 Full bandwidth. Their HDMI ports already support HDMI 2.0 Full bandwidth (HDMI 2,3), HDCP 2.2, HDCP 2.3, ARC (HDMI 3), CEC. But in very bright room, their peak brightness might be not bright enough to make the picture produced looks fairly bright. As we know, one of the most superiority of OLED TVs including the Sony A8G and A8F is about their infinite native contrast ratio and perfect black. The result, the both cannot produce very bright saturated colors fairly well, particularly very bright blues. And compare between them, their peak brightness is almost similar. On the other hand, the Sony A8F is the lowest model of Sony’s 2018 4K HDR OLED TV and at the same time is also the predecessor of the A8G. That is not much of a review. But even so, despite of their limited performance in producing very bright saturated colors, in general, they both can show their wide color gamut at entire their brightness range. Their color gamut can cover more than 96% of DCI P3 color space, which is great for HDR content that mastered in DCI P3 like HDR10. Sony says an update to Android 8.0 Oreo is coming this year, but it hasn’t arrived in the months I’ve been testing the TV. A forum community dedicated to home theater owners and enthusiasts. Sony A8F and A8G have excellent color gamut and their color gamut is almost similar. Actually, this issue has been solved in Android 8.0 Oreo that offer smoother and faster navigation. 67% Upvoted . Just like other models of OLED TV, both Sony A8F and A8G are also excellent 4K TVs with excellent performance in almost aspects of picture quality and features like perfect black level, excellent side viewing angle, instantaneous pixel response time, and others. A $500 Roku TV will run circles around the Sony from a usability standpoint, and that’s ridiculous. Sounds like buying the A8F was a good idea. In one aspect, the A8F might be superior, but on the other aspect, the A8G is superior. I'm leaning towards the sony because of the great image processing. But for OLED TVs, their peak brightness is excellent. onkyo+belles aria+marten+b&w+jl audio+audioquest+philips+sony. The different setting might get brighter peak brightness. Now, the decision certainly comes back to your according to your own preferences. The HDR capabilities show off the panel’s range, and Sony has employed its own tricks to make HDR10 content look similar to Dolby Vision content. But unfortunately, with 1080p resolution, their input lag is around 50 ms. For casual games, this actually is still acceptable, but for fast paced games, this might be little disappointing. With HDR content, they both can get brighter peak brightness. This design gives the A8F a stunning presentation of just a giant display with the trimmest of bezels surrounding it. This feature can help to make the motion looks crisper, particularly when they are playing 60 fps content like sports or video games. Nevertheless, if you feel bothered with stuttering, you can enable Motion Interpolation or Black Frame Insertion to reduce the stuttering. Sony A8G vs Sony X950G my usage of watching TV consist of Netflix, HBO, movies (Blu Ray & Streaming), occasionally video games (constantly playing different games) and watching College Football and NFL 10 hours a day during football season! Nov 18, 2019 #5 I just bought the a8g and will report back any significant findings . The excellence, even though they have good side viewing angle, their contrast ratio is still excellent. Nevertheless, although the A8F is an older than A8G but in the market, they are priced with almost the same price. I’m sure Sony’s technology provides some difference in lab tests and Sony has plenty of examples to prove it out, but if it’s any better than an LG OLED for regular viewing, it’s only incrementally so. With SDR content, their peak brightness might bright enough to overcome the glare in most bright rooms, but it is still not bright enough for an extremely bright room with a lot of sunny window. newsletter, Deep blacks, and rich colors, with wide viewing angles. The only major difference between them is on their design, particularly on their stand. If viewed from the front, they look similar with very thin border. And the lower or faster pixel response time of the TV, the motion produced will looks smoother with less motion blur. Their peak brightness is actually bright enough to overcome the glare in most bright rooms. As an illustration of its performance, if on the screen of LED TVs with VA panel, black level usually will raise started at around 15 degrees off center and front, on their screen, black level can be maintained at far wider angle, which is around 70 degrees. P. Palman Novice Member. This will help to make motion looks crisper by reducing persistence blur, particularly when they are playing 60 fps content. In the market, both Sony A8G and A8F comes in two screen sizes options only, which are 55 inches (XBR55A8F vs XBR55A8G) and 65 inches (XBR65A8F vs XBR65A8G). The advantage of its stand, it can be reserved. All of them make HDR content displayed on their screen looks really excellent. In addition to it can deliver clear dialogs, this will give an impression as if voices are coming directly from the actor’s mouth rather than a speaker unit below the TV. Unlike the A1E’s unique design with a kickstand in the back, the A8F is more traditional, with a base at the bottom that supports the TV. In order to they can show all sources with judder-free, you must set the “MotionFlow” To “TrueCinema” and “CineMotion” to “High”. Meanwhile, Sony A8F and A8G both have native 120 Hz refresh rate panel. Sony told me that the minimum bandwidth needed to stream 4K HDR content is 15 to 20Mbps, which while certainly a high-speed connection, isn’t out of reach for most internet services. Some models of Sony’s 2019 TVs like A9G or X950G might already use the new image processor called X1 Ultimate that has been integrated with AI (Artificial Intelligence). With your voice, you can open apps, change the inputs, increase/decrease volume, search within apps, ask some basic question, and others. best. They both don’t support 4K @120 Hz or HFR (High Frame Rate) content. But even so, if you feel the bandings still bother you, the bandings can be removed by enabling the “Smooth Gradation” features. This might make the color gradient looks far smoother, but on the other hand, this will cause the images loss some fine details. As far as I can tell, the 2020 A8 has incorporate much of the 2019 A9G's technology. On the other hand, even though the Sony A8G is a part of 2019 lineup, it still runs Android 7.0 Nougat while most models of 2019 lineup already run Android 8.0 Oreo. Even the stand puts the TV flush against your credenza or whatever surface it’s on — there’s no gap or legs under the screen. But except this source type, they both are great for any games. HDR images can be shown excellently with standout highlight. My local BB had a 65A8G on display and to my dismay the physical bezel that wraps around the panel is a glossy black plastic that you would expect on a budget TV at Target. If you’re in the first camp, you should buy TCL’s 6 Series TV, which costs around $650 for a 55-inch model and is the best TV you can get for less than a grand. Meanwhile, with 120 fps content, their input lags at both 1080p and 1440p resolution is excellent, which is around 20 ms. Overall, they both have excellent picture quality. But on the other hand, the instantaneous pixel response time will cause stuttering, particularly when they are playing low frame rate content like 24p movies. As we know, the OLED panel uses white sub-pixel to boost peak brightness. Additionally, their overall game performance is also great. This allows you to place a small sound bar in front without any part of the screen being blocked. A8G uses slightly less power than A8F (perhaps due to audio change). But even so, as long as you don’t often play the same game or watch the same TV channel for over long time, this should not be a problem. Granted, if you’re using an external source for your content, such as a 4K Blu-ray player, none of this will be an issue. Overall, Sony A8G and A8F are equally great TVs for mixed usage. But even so, since they have ABL, on 50 % window (50% of screen is white, while the rest is black), their peak brightness is dimmed to around 250 nits and around 150 nits on 100% window. The A8F is Sony’s latest high-end OLED TV, and it comes with a host of features, sleek design, and a high price tag. And with 120 Hz refresh rate panel, this allows them can interpolate lower frame rate content like 24p, 30 fps, 60 fps, up to 120 fps. The brightest peak brightness is reached when they are showing small bright object (less than 25% window) where they can hit around 300 nits. Even though Sony A8G and A8F are released in different year, but they use the same image processor, which is 4K HDR Processor X1 Extreme. The stand of Sony A8F has small footprints but can support well the TV. Meanwhile, with HDR content, their peak brightness is less than 1000 nits, makes them cannot show highlights images at the brightness range intended by the content creator.

Prince Chakriwat Mahidol, Thoma Bravo Team, Signo Zodiacal De Mayo, Trailblazer Ss Production Numbers, Crows In Texas Walmart Parking Lot 2020, Will Geer Net Worth At Death, 21st Amendment Variety Pack Costco, Ddsb School Locator,